Legal Opinion

BARRY SCOTT COFFEY, et al. v. CITY OF KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 8, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00353Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE BARRY SCOTT COFFEY, et al.; ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) 3:25-CV-353-KAC-JEM CITY OF KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE; ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint” filed by Defendant City of Knoxville, Tennessee [Doc. 14]. For the reasons below, the Court grants the Motion in part, dismisses the federal claims in the First Amended Complaint, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state claims. I. Background1…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Rouster Ex Rel. Estate of Rouster v. County of SaginawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API