Habedank v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
The sole issue before us in this cause is whether the trial judge erred in granting the respondent’s motion for a nonsuit. We do not think so.
Appellants in 1936 were involved in what appears to have been a serious automobile accident. Asserting negligence on the part of one Hall, they commenced actions to recover for the injuries sustained in that accident. After a two day trial of that cause, late in 1937, in which the said Hall was represented by counsel, judgments were recovered by each of the three appellants, the sum of all the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kindervater v. Motorists Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Schmid v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Coopersmith v. KaltSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Kleinman v. Globe and Rutgers Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Pellington v. Erie Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brindley v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- McKinney v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Planet Ins. v. Anglo American Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998