Legal Opinion

Kleinman v. Globe and Rutgers Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 27, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perkie, J.

This appeal seeks to review a jury verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff-respondent. We desire, at the very outset, to point out that the state of case submitted does not contain the judgment complained of and to be considered by the court. All that appears is a mere statement at the end of the answer in the following form: “The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for forty-nine hundred dollars ($4,900).”

It is elementary learning that an appeal does not lie in any case until there is a final judgment. 2 Comp. Stat., p. 2207.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Booth v. KeeganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  2. O'Connor v. Maryland Motor Car InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. BlaineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  4. Chapin v. KrepsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  5. Klein v. ShryerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whittle v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  2. Pape v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. State v. CottrellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Ordinary of New Jersey v. WebbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  5. Habedank v. Atlantic Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API