Kleinman v. Globe and Rutgers Fire Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perkie, J.
This appeal seeks to review a jury verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff-respondent. We desire, at the very outset, to point out that the state of case submitted does not contain the judgment complained of and to be considered by the court. All that appears is a mere statement at the end of the answer in the following form: “The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for forty-nine hundred dollars ($4,900).”
It is elementary learning that an appeal does not lie in any case until there is a final judgment. 2 Comp. Stat., p. 2207.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Booth v. KeeganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- O'Connor v. Maryland Motor Car InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. BlaineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Chapin v. KrepsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Klein v. ShryerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whittle v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Pape v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- State v. CottrellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Ordinary of New Jersey v. WebbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Habedank v. Atlantic Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.