Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. John B. Velezmoro

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 31, 2016No. 73542-0-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpearman, J.

¶1 Restitution is mandatory “whenever the offender is convicted of an offense which results in injury to any person . . . .” RCW 9.94A.753(5). John B. Velezmoro was one of an unknown number of people who possessed pornographic images of “Vicky,” 1 a victim of child sexual abuse. Velezmoro pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography. At a restitution hearing, the trial court determined that Velezmoro’s offense was a cause of the injury Vicky suffered from the ongoing distribution of images of her abuse. The court ordered Velezmoro to pay restitution toward Vicky’s actual losses.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Kevin Joe BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. State v. VelezmoroWashington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API