Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1981No. 87PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendants assign as error numerous evidentiary rulings and the failure of the trial judge adequately to summarize the evidence in his charge to the jury. After careful examination of each of defendants’ contentions we conclude that both received a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

The state’s evidence tends to show the following: At approximately 2:00 a.m. on 27 September 1979 a customer of the Stop-N-Go store in Washington, North Carolina, discovered the body of the deceased, James Perry Ebron, the store operator, lying face down on the floor in the store near the cash…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API