Legal Opinion

Kell v. Jansen

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1942No. Civ. 6766PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Plaintiffs were the .owners of certain land in Shasta County across which a natural stream known as the east fork of Clear Creek ran in a southwesterly direction to its confluence with Clear Creek which ran along the west side of the property. The only access to the house occupied by the Kells upon the premises was by a road leading from a county road and crossing the east fork over a bridge which Mr. Kell had constructed. Plaintiffs also owned a water right appurtenant to their property, and water for the irrigation of some fifteen or twenty acres of their land was diverted from the said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Chidester v. Consolidated Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Salstrom v. Orleans Bar Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Smith v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Armitage v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API