Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Southern Surety Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cukiam.

Plaintiff, an employee of defendant, was engaged in loading rock, in a field, to be hauled to and used in the construction of a highway. Some of the rocks were too large to be loaded. Plaintiff was instructed by his foreman to burst these large rocks with a sledge hammer furnished him for that purpose. While bursting a large rock with this hammer, a piece of the rock flew up and hit him in the eye, injuring it.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant failed to furnish him with goggles or wire screens, to be used while bursting the rocks, for the protection of his eyes, and that such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Fore v. GearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schaum v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Johnson v. Wichita Valley Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Muldrow v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Muldrow v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API