People v. Lane
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The police did not violate the defendant’s right to counsel under the State Constitution by obtaining the statement after the victim had signed a felony complaint. Although the right to counsel attaches once the criminal action has been commenced (People v Blake, 35 NY2d 331; People v Settles, 46 NY2d 154) that stage had not been reached in this case. As we noted in People v Samuels (49 NY2d 218), in this State the criminal action commences with the filing of the accusatory instrument, including the felony…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. HamlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. HilliardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. HornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Lane v. LeFevreDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.