Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Eeboe to review a judgment of tbe circuit court for Monroe county: E. C. Hig-bee, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimliN, J.

Tbe plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were, with three others not before this court, pro*662ceeded against for assault with intent to do great bodily barm upon one Allen, and convicted of assault and battery. Defendants contend that tbe court erred (1) in refusing to grant them a separate trial; (2) in refusing to discharge tbe defendants; (3) in refusing to require tbe state to elect; (4) in rulings upon evidence; (5) in giving and refusing instructions.

Allen was a man about fifty-seven years of age, a vagrant wbo drifted into tbe village of Cataract and was banging around…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emery v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hilmes v. StroebelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Rhinehart v. WhiteheadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Day v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  2. Pollack v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Flamme v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State v. MeatingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API