Legal Opinion

Piersol v. Grimes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.

Piersol sued Grimes upon the assignment of a promissory note, alleging the assignment to have been made by indorsement to Barton (who is made a party to answer to his interest), and that Barton afterwards transferred the note and . indorsement by mere delivery to the plaintiff, and that some one, without the knowledge or consent of the 'plaintiff, had erased the name of Barton in the assignment and inserted the name of the plaintiff.' The complaint also alleged facts showing due diligence in prosecuting the maker of the note to insolvency,. &e. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grimes v. PiersolIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John v. HatfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Bercot v. VelkoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Eckert v. LouisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Casto v. EvingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Lohman v. ReymondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API