Legal Opinion

Application of Giorgio G. Soli

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 6, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of method claim 13, the sole claim in application Ser. No. 587,521, filed May 28, 1956, for “Petroleum and Natural Gas Prospecting.”

The basis for and the general nature of appellant’s invention is disclosed in the specification as follows:

“The method is based on the fact that, in many instances in oil and gas areas, gaseous hydrocarbons are slowly escaping through the sedimentary formations to the surface. These gases serve as a steady supply of carbon and energy to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re ChevenardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. In re YatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. Application of Joachim Stroszynski and Erwin GrimmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API