Legal Opinion

In re Chevenard

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 8, 1943No. 4804PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the final rejection by the Primary Examiner of all of the claims, 8, 10, 12 and 13, of an application for a patent alleging “Improvements' in the Manufacture of Compensating Spiral Springs for Watches, Chronometers and the Dike.” This is a companion appeal to Appeal No. 4805.

■ \Claims.-8,and, 10 are 'illustrative of<the sub ject. matter involved and read as follows:

*8038. A process for the manufacture of compensating spiral springs for watches, chronometers and the like, which comprises the steps…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GuntherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of Giorgio G. SoliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API