Legal Opinion

United States v. Gambino

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 15, 1993No. CR-90-1051 (S-3)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge:

The defendants, Thomas Gambino, Guiseppe Gambino, and Philip Loscalzo have filed motions which seek to (a) dismiss the superseding indictment against Thomas Gambino; (b) dismiss Count Three of that indictment for improper venue; (c) strike prejudicial surplusage from the indictment; (d) exclude certain evidence; and (e) obtain disclosure.

I

Dismissal of Superseding Indictment Against Thomas Gambino

Thomas Gambino was initially charged in an indictment that was filed on December 12, 1990 with two counts alleging violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) (RICO)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas GambinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API