Legal Opinion

Dethloff v. Starbuck

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1927No. 19902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKinkade, J.

This is an action to enforce payment of a commission of $340 due for services rendered in effecting a sale of real estate. The broker secured a judgment in the trial court for the full amount claimed; the Court of Appeals on error affirmed this judgment.

The plaintiff in error, the owner of the real estate, herein referred to as owner, employed by verbal contract the defendant in error, herein referred to as broker, to sell the real estate in question. The price fixed was $9,000 net to the owner, the broker to get his commission, the amount of the commission not then being definitely fixed,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bauman v. WorleyOhio Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Durbin & Koryta Co. v. TannenbaumOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Eberle v. BertleTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API