Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Worley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1957No. 35052Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmeRmaN, J.

The bill of exceptions discloses that Marian E. Gfroerer was desirous of purchasing a home in the city of Cincinnati or its environs. Late in 1953 or early in 1954, Mrs. Gfroerer and Emma M. Foster, plaintiff’s licensed saleswoman and agent, made contact and together over a period of time visited several localities in and about Cincinnati and viewed numerous residence properties. Mrs. Gfroerer also made a number of independent excursions and on one of them noticed favorably a house in process of construction at 2609 Bonnie Drive, Cincinnati, and owned by defendants. Later, Mrs. Gfroerer and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bullis Thomas v. CalvertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Clark v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Averill v. O'FarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Hoke v. MarcisOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Atkinson v. S. L. Nusbaum & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API