Legal Opinion

Durbin & Koryta Co. v. Tannenbaum

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1929No. 9785Published

1Opinion of the Court

VICKERY, PJ.

Where a real estate broker has been employed and he is the means of procuring the sale, if the seller of the property sells direct to this purchaser at a lower price than the real estate man or broker had been given authority to sell it, the broker could not thus b'e deprived of the right to compensation. The broker was the moving cause of producing the purchaser, and it would be inequitable and unfair, and would open the door wide for fraud if, after a prospective purchaser has been introduced to the sellers, they then, by a simple act of their own terminate their relation with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dethloff v. StarbuckOhio Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API