Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. Patterson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ogle county.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Walker

When this ease was before us at a former term (see 69 Ill. 650) the judgment was reversed, because the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. After being remanded, and tried with a similar result, it comes again before us for hearing on appeal.

It is urged that the statute has prohibited the court from reversing, as by so doing it would be to grant more than two new trials to appellant in this case. The 57th section of the Practice act provides that, “ No more than two new trials upon the same grounds shall be granted to the same party in the same cause.” Appellee refers to several cases…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolbrecht v. BaumgartenIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mt. Adams & E. P. Inclined Ry. Co. v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Cromer's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  3. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. FlynnIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Norkevich v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  5. Columbus Street Railway Co. v. PaceOhio Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API