Legal Opinion

Dobschuetz v. Holliday

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1876PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snydeb, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

Petitioners contracted with the lessee in possession of the premises described, to build for him an engine, and do other work in constructing the necessary apparatus for hoisting coal from the mines he was about to open in the demised lands. There was a definite agreement as to the amount to be paid for the engine, and the tíme and manner of payment were fixed, "but not as to the other articles to be furnished and the labor to be performed in setting the machinery. All other work was embraced in a different, contemporaneous agreement. One-half the contract price of the engine was to be paid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ombony v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Gaskill v. TrainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Cheney v. BonnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Kidder v. AholtzIllinois Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Williams v. VanderbiltIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cary Hardware Co. v. McCartyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. R. Haas Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Springfield Amusement Park Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Fifield v. Farmers' National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API