Legal Opinion
Dow v. Brookline Trust Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 10, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
On November 20, 1930, the plaintiff, in order to enable her husband, the defendant Dow, to borrow money from the defendant Brookline Trust Company, hereafter called the bank, gave to the bank an instrument which, upon the record, is referred to as the blanket authority to pledge. This instrument authorized the bank to receive from Dow, as general collateral, security for the payment of any notes or other liabilities of the plaintiff or Dow, whether direct or indirect, due or to become due, existing when said security should be accepted or thereafter to arise. It contained a blank space for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- National Mahaiwe Bank v. PeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Lawyers Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Paramount Laundries Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Godard v. Babson-Dow Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- McCarthy v. Brockton National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Milbank v. J. C. Littlefield, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Davis v. Newburyport Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Anderson v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.