Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Heatley
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 12, 1993No. 31262-6-IPublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
Petitioner Robert Heatley seeks discretionary review of a RAU decision affirming his convictions in Seattle Municipal Court for driving while intoxicated and negligent driving. A commissioner referred the motion for discretionary review to a panel of judges for determination. Because the issues raised are of public interest, RAP 2.3(d)(3), we grant the motion for discretionary review, accelerate review pursuant to RAP 18.12, and affirm.
Heatley was charged in Seattle Municipal Court with reckless driving and driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI). Seattle Municipal Code…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- United States v. Jermaine Boney, United States of America v. Donald A. HollomanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.