Legal Opinion
In Re Progress Lektro Shave Corporation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 8, 1940No. 19151PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, District Judge.
The petition challenges an order of the referee holding that a public sale by the trustee of articles belonging to the estate but concededly protected by the patent of one Aaron, the petitioner herein, constituted no infringement. It was found, however, that $1,000 would fairly represent Aaron’s damage, if the sale were held to constitute an infringement.
The trustee and the government, as a prior creditor on a tax claim, in opposi-. tion to the patentee’s claim rely almost wholly upon Sawin v. Guild, Fed.Cas.No. 12,391. That was a case in which a sheriff, having for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- In Re Paramount Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Platt & Munk Co. v. Republic Graphics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- In re I. J. Knight Realty Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- The Platt & Munk Co., Inc. v. Republic Graphics, Inc., the Platt & Munk Co., Inc. v. Playmore, Inc., Lederer Industries, Inc. And J. C. Boyan Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- In the Matter of I. J. Knight Realty Corp., Bankrupt. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- In the Matter of I. J. Knight Realty Corp., Bankrupt. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967