Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Matter of I. J. Knight Realty Corp., Bankrupt. Reading Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 6, 1967No. 15507_1Published

1DissentFreedman, Circuit Judge

I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that § 64a(l) requires the virtual immunization from tort liability of a business which is conducted by a receiver in a Chapter XI proceeding. Congress has not given us a blueprint which yields an immediate and unequivocal answer to the question and I would therefore approach it as would men of practical business experience. I believe the conclusion to which this points is in harmony with the applicable law and accords with the equitable role of the Bankruptcy Court (§ 2 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 11(a); see, e. g., Bank of Marin v. England, 87…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API