Legal Opinion
Amoco Corp v. U.S. Department of Energy
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 1990No. 7-18PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PECK, Judge:
This appeal arose from the denial by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of Amoco’s late application in the Aminoil res-titutionary fund proceeding pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart V. Amoco appealed the OHA ruling and it was reversed by the district court. For the reasons stated below, we now reverse the district court.
FACTS
During the period that petroleum price controls were in effect, Amoco bought substantial quantities of natural gas liquids from Solar Gas, Inc. Solar Gas was a subsidiary of Burmah Oil, which later changed its name to Aminoil. In July 1975, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. EdwardsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. HerringtonTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1987
- Payne 22, Inc. v. United StatesTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Drilling & Energy Corp. v. WatkinsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990
- The Rio Grande, El Paso and Santa Fe Railroad Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Sinclair Oil Corp. v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- Sinclair Oil Corporation v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002