Legal Opinion
Fasciana v. County of Suffolk
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 7, 2014No. 13-CV-1885 (JS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiff Mark A. Fasciana (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action on April 5, 2013 against defendants Suffolk County (the “County”) and Hyundai Capital America Inc. f/k/a Hyundai Motor Finance Company (“Hyundai” and together with the County, “Defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 to redress violations of the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States *178Constitution. Currently pending before the Court is the County’s motion to dismiss the Complaint. For the following reasons, the County’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marino v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- DeCastro v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Corbley v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Leniece Bruney v. City of New York; Thomas P. Smith, individually; Stephen Lewis, individually; and Ahmed Abdulla, individuallyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v. The County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.