Price v. Swartz
Indiana Court of Appeals
Action by Milbert F. Price and Louis E. Lyons, partners, doing business under the name of the Puritan Manufacturing Co., against Harry D. Swartz. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Rule twenty-two of the Supreme Court and this court provides that “the brief of appellant shall contain a short and clear statement, disclosing: (1) The nature of the action. (2) "What the issues were. (3) How the issues were decided, and what the judgment or decree was. (4) The errors relied upon for reversal. (5) A concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and exception relied on, referring to the pages and lines of the transcript. If the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict or finding in fact or law, is assigned, the statement shall contain a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago, Indiana & Eastern Railway Co. v. Wysor Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Magnuson v. BillingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Albaugh Bros., Dover & Co. v. LynasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- King v. State ex rel. Halbert TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Webster v. BlighIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Johnson v. BradyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Carmody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Evansville Railways Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Rahke v. McNultyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.