Rahke v. McNulty
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Superior Court of Marion County (83,409); Charles J. Orbison, Judge. Action by August E. Rahke against Charles O. McNulty. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtShea, P. J.
This was an action to recover money alleged to have been lost in gambling. Appellant states in his brief that he relies on the following errors in the proceedings for a reversal of the judgment of the court below: (1) The court erred “in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to appellant’s set-off.” (2) The “court erred in not instructing *616jury to find for appellant.” (3) The “court erred in giving instructions Nos. 4 and 5 and in refusing to give all of the instructions asked by appellant.” (4) The “court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.”
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. No question is presented…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Bennett v. Root Furniture Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Dillon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Pry v. RamageIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Citizens National Bank v. AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gary & Interurban Railway Co. v. HackerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- State Exchange Bank v. PaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Vandalia Coal Co. v. BlandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- City of Martinsville v. WinscottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940