Legal Opinion

King v. State ex rel. Halbert Township

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1911No. 7,196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Martin Circuit Court; Clinton K.'Tharp, Special Judge. Action by The State of Indiana, on the relation of Halbert Township of Martin County, Indiana, against Carl C. King and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

— This action was brought by the State, on the relation of Halbert township of Martin county, against Carl C. King and others for an alleged breach of a gravel road contractor’s bond.

1. Rule twenty-two of the Supreme Court and this court is as follows: “The brief of appellant shall contain a short and clear statement disclosing: First. The nature of the action. Second. What the issues were. Third. How the issues were decided, and what the judgment or decree was. Fourth. The errors relied upon for reversal. Fifth. A concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Griffith v. FeltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Dillon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Price v. SwartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Jeffersonville School Township v. School City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Milburn v. WaggonerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API