Legal Opinion

Carney, Inc. v. City of Trenton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 2, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

235 N.J. Super. 372 (1988)

562 A.2d 807

THOMAS P. CARNEY, INC., AND MICHELE GIGLIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF TRENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TRENTON WATER WORKS, AND FITZPATRICK & ASSOCIATES, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 12, 1988.

Decided December 2, 1988.

Before Judges LONG and KEEFE.

David J. Kenny, argued cause for appellant (Hartsough, Kenny & Innes, attorneys, David J. Kenny on the brief).

George T. Dougherty, City Attorney, argued cause for respondents, City of Trenton and Trenton Water Works.

Ann F. Kiernan, argued cause for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stano v. Soldo Constr. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  2. P. Michelotti & Sons, Inc. v. Borough of Fair LawnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Hancock v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Township of Brick v. SpivakNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Township of Brick v. SpivakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ray Bell Construction Co. v. School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Gaglioti Contracting, Inc. v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. Prismatic Dev. v. Somerset CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Pagan v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. COLONNELLI BROS. v. Ridgefield ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API