Legal Opinion

Township of Brick v. Spivak

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 12, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion. Appellants’ position depends upon the hypothesis that the Legislature in fact intended that a majority vote for three candidates shall result in the election of the next four candidates as well. We cannot be sure the Legislature so intended. We see no substantial constitutional issue.

No costs.

Eor affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Fbancis, Peootoe, Hall, Schettino and Hare- man—7.

For reversal—None.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re KraemerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carney, Inc. v. City of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  2. Della Serra v. Borough of MountainsideNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. In Re KraemerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967