Legal Opinion

Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1997No. B106780PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.—

Introduction

In Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899 [153 Cal.Rptr. 854, 592 P.2d 341] (Pruneyard), the California Supreme Court held that state constitutional provisions protect the right to engage in “speech and petitioning, reasonably exercised, in shopping centers even when the centers are privately owned.” (23 Cal.3d at p. 910, italics added.) The court based its conclusion on the growing role of shopping centers as centers of commerce in our society. However, as the italicized phrase indicates, the right to conduct expressive activities in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Trader Joe's Co. v. Progressive Campaigns, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Hamburg v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Albertson's, Inc. v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Green Party v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  5. Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Sprint Telephony PCS, LP v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API