Legal Opinion

Hammons v. Hammons

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1984No. 48037, 48938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAERTNER, Judge.

Defendants Georgia Hammons and James Hammons appeal from the denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment entered by the trial court pursuant to an order imposing sanctions for failure to comply with the trial court’s discovery orders. The judgment is reversed and remanded.

Defendants first contend that the trial court erred in refusing to set aside its order, which imposed discovery sanctions, and the subsequent default judgment because defendants received no notice pursuant to Rule 74.78.

Plaintiff brought the present action against defendants for replevin and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Page v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Vickery v. ACF Industries, IncorporatedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Traders Bank of Kansas City v. Cherokee Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. General Motors Assembly DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Tinsley v. GosnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Krueger v. PerezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Rice v. RiceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Trotter v. DistlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API