Tinsley v. Gosnell
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Appellant-Defendant, Larry Gosnell, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his “Motion to Set Aside Default” after the court had entered judgment in favor of Respondent-Plaintiff, Daniel Tinsley. We reverse and remand.
On March 2, 1990, Tinsley filed a suit for fraud against Gosnell and a second defendant Gary Linderer. The petition alleged Gosnell and Linderer had falsely represented to Tinsley that if he would invest $12,000 with them, they would guarantee ownership represented by common stock to be issued in a venture to be incorporated. Tinsley alleged he did invest $12,000…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cotleur v. DanzigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Eastin v. FranklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Herrin v. StrausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Vetter & Associates, Inc. v. Dimarco Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Friedman v. Caring Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kerth v. Polestar EntertainmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Treetop Village Property Owners Ass'n v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Breckenridge Material Co. v. EnloeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Dent Wizard International Corp. v. Brown (In Re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1999
- McMillan v. WellsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.