Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Gosnell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1994No. 64622PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Appellant-Defendant, Larry Gosnell, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his “Motion to Set Aside Default” after the court had entered judgment in favor of Respondent-Plaintiff, Daniel Tinsley. We reverse and remand.

On March 2, 1990, Tinsley filed a suit for fraud against Gosnell and a second defendant Gary Linderer. The petition alleged Gosnell and Linderer had falsely represented to Tinsley that if he would invest $12,000 with them, they would guarantee ownership represented by common stock to be issued in a venture to be incorporated. Tinsley alleged he did invest $12,000…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cotleur v. DanzigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Eastin v. FranklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Herrin v. StrausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Vetter & Associates, Inc. v. Dimarco Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Friedman v. Caring Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kerth v. Polestar EntertainmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Treetop Village Property Owners Ass'n v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Breckenridge Material Co. v. EnloeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Dent Wizard International Corp. v. Brown (In Re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1999
  5. McMillan v. WellsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API