Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Dunbar Funeral Home

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 20, 1986No. 0608PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Appellant Frances Roberts sued respondent Dunbar Funeral Home for outrage and invasion of privacy. The trial judge granted Dunbar’s motion for involuntary nonsuit as to both causes of action. Mrs. Roberts appeals. We affirm.

Although Mrs. Roberts sets forth nine exceptions in the record, each raises the issue of whether the trial judge committed error in granting Dunbar’s motion for involuntary nonsuit. A tenth exception assigns error to the trial judge’s striking evidence.

In reviewing the trial court’s granting of the motion for involuntary nonsuit, the evidence must be viewed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ford v. HutsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Meetze Ex Rel. Golden v. Associated PressSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Stanley Smith & Sons v. Limestone CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Rycroft v. GaddyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Nash v. AT & T Nassau MetalsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Craig v. Andrew Aaron & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
  4. Flowers v. South Carolina Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Gary Nestler v. Bishop of CharlestonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API