Legal Opinion

Rycroft v. Gaddy

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1984No. 0126PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge;

This is an action for abuse of process, invasion of privacy, and negligence. The trial judge granted the respondents’ motion for involuntary non-suit with prejudice. We affirm.

The instant case arose out of an earlier lawsuit between the appellant-Rycroft and the respondent-Tanguay. Rycroft and Tanguay were equal shareholders in a corporation when Tycroft sued for dissolution of the corporation. Tanguay retained the respondent-Gaddy as counsel and counter-claimed alleging that Rycroft had defrauded the corporation.

The day before the commencement of the trial, Tanguay and Gaddy…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Peterson v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Meetze Ex Rel. Golden v. Associated PressSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Huggins v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. Beard v. Akzona, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Swinton Creek Nursery v. Edisto Farm CreditSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Snakenberg v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. O'Shea v. LesserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Bullard v. EhrhardtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API