Legal Opinion

Flowers v. South Carolina Department of Highways

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 13, 1992No. 1851PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

This action involves the review under the South Carolina Administrative Procedures Act, S.C. Code, Ann. §§ 1-23-310 et seq. (1986), of a decision by South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation that an outdoor advertising sign owned by Eugene M. Flowers, Steve Flowers, Frederick A. Miller, III, Gerald L. Millis, and Fred A. Miller, Jr., doing business as Stuckey’s of Coosawhatchi, Inc., and erected on land belonging to Clarence J. Fennell was an illegal, nonconforming sign under the Highway Advertising Control Act, S.C. Code Ann. §§ 57-25-110 et seq. (1991).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Doris v. Police Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, South Carolina, Inc. v. K & M Tool & Die, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Outdoor Advertising Board v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Myrtle Beach v. Juel P. Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API