Boehm v. Wermuth
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenbeRRY, J.
The findings of fact in this case are combined with a decision which makes it very difficult to separate findings from observations, conclusions, and argu-. ments. The nature of findings of fact and conclusions of law is indicated in Cointe v. Congregation of St. John the Baptist, 154 Wis. 405, 143 N. W. 180. It is not necessary for us to repeat here what was said in that case in respect to the value of the opinion of the trial court, nor should it be necessary to emphasize the fact that an opinion, relating to findings of fact and conclusions of law, however helpful, is not in compliance…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cointe v. Congregation of St. John the BaptistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Chinchilla Ranch, Inc. v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Coolidge v. RuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Dawley v. DawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.