Legal Opinion

Kleidosty v. Employment Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 18, 1992No. 91-344PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Toni Kleidosty was an employee of Rol-screen Company in its Oskaloosa, Iowa, plant when she pled guilty to delivery of cocaine, a class “C” felony. Rolscreen fired Kleidosty for violating a company rule that prohibited “illegal, immoral, or indecent” conduct by its employees. A job service hearing officer ruled that Kleidosty was entitled to unemployment benefits, and an administrative law judge agreed. The Employment Appeal Board reversed in a two-to-one decision, ruling that Kleidosty’s misconduct caused her unemployment and that her conduct was work connected. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Huntoon v. Iowa Department of Job ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. Higgins v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. In re the Claim of BruggemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Larson v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. Masom v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sellers v. Employment Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1995
  2. Freeland v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Freeland v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. Rob M. Galey v. Employment Appeal Board and Wapello Rural Water Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API