Legal Opinion

Pena v. Travelers Ins. Co. (In re Pena)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 7, 2018No. A164924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.

*742This workers' compensation case requires us to determine the correct remedy when the Workers' Compensation Division provides surveillance video of a claimant to a panel of medical arbiters in violation of one of the agency's own rules, OAR 436-030-0155(4)(a). We agree with claimant that OAR 436-030-0155(4)(a) precludes the agency from relying upon findings in a medical arbiter panel's report that are based on the arbiters' improper consideration of surveillance video, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings under a correct interpretation of that rule.

Claimant was injured at work in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HOGEVOLLOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. BiscottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Oregon Cable Telecommunications Ass'n v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Growing Green Panda v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. County of Klamath v. RicardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Karl v. Dept of SafetyColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API