Legal Opinion
American Automobile Ins. v. Mack
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided July 18, 1940No. 12PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWINFORD, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed its bill for a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C.A. § 400.
The defendants Harry Mack, C. J. Crawford and A. M. Caldwell have filed their motions to dismiss.
The facts briefly are these: The defendant Harry Mack holds a policy of insurance with the plaintiff. The policy provides among other things that the insurance company will hold Harry Mack harmless up to an amount of $5,000, should he be obligated by reason of the liability imposed for damages for bodily injury caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Associated Indemnity Corporation v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Phoenix National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Louisville Railway Co. v. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MFA Mutual Insurance Company v. MullinDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
- Ida Mae Beam, Pearl Cabble, William Thompson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Peake v. RamseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Great American Insurance Co. of New York v. DennisDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1962