Legal Opinion
Peake v. Ramsey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 1945No. Nos. 299, 301, 300PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
The actions below arose out of a collision between an automobile operated by Peake and one operated by Ramsey. Mrs. Peake *764and Miss Patrick were passengers in Peake’s car, and they and he brought separate actions against Ramsey. In Peake’s action, Ramsey filed a counter-claim; and in the actions of the two passengers Ramsey brought Peake in as a third-party defendant, seeking contribution from him in the event the jury should find that the passengers’ injuries resulted from the concurrent negligence of Peake and Ramsey. The jury found in favor of Ramsey as defendant in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- McKenna v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Miller v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garozynski v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Montague v. HendersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Vasaio v. CampitelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Shenk v. GaudetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Merchants Mutual Insurance Co. v. RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.