Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Catawba County v. Edens

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1982No. 8125SC529PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the court’s ruling that the terms of the Christine M. Geitner testamentary trust gave defendant trustees sole discretion, and the right to exercise such discretion, in determining whether to contribute to the support of David R. Geitner. Plaintiff argues that the trust’s terms require defendants to make a contribution from the testamentary trust whenever the income from the guardianship account is not sufficient to pay for David R. Geitner’s support for the relevant year.

The powers of a trustee are either mandatory or discretionary. A power is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Cox v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Kuykendall v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Boswell v. BoswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. ChandleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Dickerson Carolina, Inc. v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Lineback Ex Rel. Hutchens v. StoutCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Pittman v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Union Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API