Legal Opinion

Arbitration Claim of A. O. Andersen Trading Co. v. Brimberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarsh, J.

In an arbitration proceeding cross-motions are now made respectively to confirm and to reject the award of the arbitrator. Both motions involve the same points. The defendant objects to the award on the ground that the arbitrator admitted hearsay and otherwise incompetent testimony, misconstrued the agreement out of which the controversy arose and applied the wrong measure of damages. These matters, however, are not open for consideration at this time, as the award of an arbitrator cannot be set aside for mere errors of judgment, either as to the law or as to the facts. Matter of Goff & Sons,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between D. Goff & Sons, Inc. & RheinauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. In re the Arbitration between Commercial Solvents Corp. & Louisiana Liquid Fertilizer Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. Frazier v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Shapiro v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cresroad Estates Inc. v. TenzerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API