Legal Opinion

Watkoche v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1916No. 8348Published

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County ; George C. Crump, Judge. Suit by Lucineal Schultz against Watkoche and others and R. B. Selvidge. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. On motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

Defendant in error Lucineal Schultz brought suit in the district court of Okfuskee county against plaintiffs in error and defendants in error Selvidge, Owens, Gayer, and Caldwell, to clear her title to certain lands situated in said county. Thereupon defendants in error above named filed disclaimers, and plaintiffs in error filed answers and cross-petitions. Upon trial, judgment was for plaintiff decreeing to her the fee-simple title to said lands and cancelling and removing as a cloud upon her title the conveyances by which plaintiffs in error held, and they bring the case here.

Motion for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Seibert v. First Nat. Bank of OkeeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Love v. CavettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. De Bolt v. Farmers' Exchange BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. General Electric Co. v. Sapulpa & I. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API