Legal Opinion
Linen v. Lanford
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 2008No. 06-CV-1109, 06-CV-1180PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
A residential property tenant brought suit against his landlord alleging that the landlord violated his rights under the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act, D.C.Code § 42-3404.02 et seq. (2001). The tenant argued that the property was a two-unit accommodation and that thus under D.C.Code § 42-3404.10(3) he was entitled to a ninety-day settlement period rather than the sixty-day period that the landlord afforded him. The tidal court granted the landlord’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that the property was a single-family dwelling and that the landlord did not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Colbert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hollins v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Goldkind v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gomez v. Independence Management of Delaware, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bean v. GutierrezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Natalie Khawam v. Grayson P. WolfeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- RICHARD C. BARTEL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Malik Corp. v. Tenacity Group, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.