Legal Opinion

State v. Chagnon

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 1995No. 93-108PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, Gary Chagnon, was convicted of attempted murder. RSA 626:8 (1986); RSA 629:1 (1986); RSA 630:1-a (1986 & Supp. 1994). The defendant appeals, arguing that the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) violated the work product doctrine by ordering him to provide to the State the contents of an investigative file. We affirm.

Prior to trial the defendant sought extensive discovery from the State, including “[a]ny and all statements whether written, reported, recorded or otherwise transcribed or summarized, of all witnesses that may be called by the State . . . .” The State sought reciprocal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. People v. LegoIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. State v. ZwickerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. New Hampshire Right to Life & a. v. Director, New Hampshire Charitable Trusts Unit & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. DurhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. People v. HoltzmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API