People v. Holtzman
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.
i
NATURE OF THE CASE
Recently, the Michigan Supreme Court promulgated Michigan’s reciprocal criminal discovery rule, MCR 6.201, which mandates, among other things, that a party provide the opposing party with “any written or recorded statement by a lay witness whom the party intends to call at trial” upon request by the opposing party. MCR 6.201(A)(2).
This prosecutor’s appeal raises an issue of first impression under MCR 6.201(A)(2): does the term statement as used in this subrule include the attorneys’ notes of interviews with witnesses whom the attorney intends to call at trial? Or, does the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Disbarment of PlaskettSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- People v. GraceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Moorer v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- People of Michigan v. Dwayne Andrew DealMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- People of Michigan v. Joseph Nathan PerezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.