Marvin K. Woods v. The Bank of New York, and the 44 Wall Street Fund, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
Involved in this appeal is a narrow but important issue affecting investment law: does a bank servicing shareholders as a transfer agent for a mutual fund have a duty to read and act upon directions written on the memorandum portion of a check? Opinions authored by Judges Holmes, Cardozo, and Hand — whose views we will consider in a moment — have answered in the negative a similar question where a bank acts in its ordinary commercial capacity. But the trial court reasoned that the rationale of those cases did not apply in this case. We disagree with the district…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whiting v. . Hudson Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Empire Trust Co. v. CahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State Nat. Bank of Springfield v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- American Surety Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Childs v. Empire Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Ulysses Tines (94-5920), Glynn Bridgeforth (94-5923), and Belinda Marshall (94-5926)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- US BANK NAT. ASS'N v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- United States v. SingerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Clay Stuart Gregory v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.