U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Whitney
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Title 62A RCW, requires, first and foremost, good faith, fair dealing, and commercial reasonableness. The code also requires that payment on a promissory note must be tendered in the amount due and at the place stated in the instrument. Here, a debtor purported to tender payment at a bank branch other than that designated as the place for payment, in an amount less than the amount due, and with a third-party check — all without explanation. This tender did not, then, constitute payment on the notes. We reverse the trial court’s ruling to the contrary. We…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Department of Fisheries v. J-Z Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Oregon Mut. Ins. Co. v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- US BANK NAT. ASS'N v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Margitan v. Spokane CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023