Greenbaum v. Turrill
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order, and from a judgment, in the Nineteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Wiibeler, J. After the decision, the respondents filed their petition that the appeal be reheard in Bank, and the application was denied.
1Opinion of the Court
Morrison, C. J.:
The plaintiffs brought an action in the late District Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District, on a promissory note given by the defendant to one James Morgan. The complaint avers, that the note was indorsed by Morgan to the plaintiffs before maturity, that the payment thereof has been duly demanded, and that the whole amount of principal and interest remains due and unpaid. The defendant filed an answer in which he “ denies that the promissory note mentioned in the complaint was made for value received; denies that he, defendant, ever received any consideration therefor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- The People v. . McCumberNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Roby v. HallockNew York Supreme Court · 1878
- Gostorfs v. Taaffe, McCahill & Co.California Supreme Court · 1861
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Prichard v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lybecker v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Pacific Mill Co. v. InmanOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Cont'l Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ford Motor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.