Legal Opinion
Miceli v. Olcott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 7, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), entered September 20, 1984, which granted the motion of the defendant Dorsey Trailers, Inc. (hereinafter Dorsey) for summary judgment dismissing the action insofar as it is asserted against it.
Order reversed, with costs, and motion denied.
For purposes of this appeal we assume, arguendo, that Dorsey has established a defense " ' "sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment” in [its] favor (CPLR 3212, subd [b]) *…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Krupp v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kenworthy v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rotz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Gold v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Palisades Office Group, Ltd. v. KwileckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Wohlgemuth v. LoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Balmir v. PollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.